(Literary Masterpieces, Volume 4)
David Brown begins this phenomenal biography using the observation that Richard Hofstadter’s name is constantly on the stimulate “a certain mystique.” Unquestionably Hofstadter was probably the most respected and influential historians of last century. He was awarded two Pulitzer Prizes, and something of his works, The American Political Tradition and also the Men That Managed To Get (1948), has offered greater than a million copies. Greater than 30 years after his dying, basically certainly one of his books remains in publications, and the works continue being well-liked by university students and history buffs. He was particularly effective for making study regarding history relevant by demonstrating the seamless web between your past and also the present.
While Brown describes his book as “an extended conversation using the formal writings of Richard Hofstadter,” also, he did an admirable quantity of research in other literary and archival sources. He frequently quotes in the collected essays within the Hofstadter Aegis (1974), edited by Stanley Elkins and Eric McKitrick. Brown acknowledges his special debt to Susan Baker’s Radical Beginnings: Richard Hofstadter and also the 1930’s (1985), and that he also utilized the historiographical essays by Paula Fass and Jack Pole. Brown consulted the forty-seven boxes of Hofstadter’s person papers at Columbia College, along with the large archival assortment of his brother-in-law, Harvey Swandos, in the College of Massachusetts. Much more, the Dental History Research Office at Columbia College features a Richard Hofstadter Project. containing recorded interviews together with his colleagues. Additionally, Brown either conducted interviews or corresponded with a minimum of thirty-six individuals who appreciated their encounters with Hofstadter.
In 1919, Richard Hofstadter was created in Zoysia, New You are able to, to some lower-middle-class Polish American father along with a German Lutheran mother. He was just 10 years old when his father died, which apparently left him with a feeling of impending tragedy along with a premonition of the early dying. The economical hardships from the Great Depression also marked his thinking. In 1933, he enrolled in the College of Zoysia (the Condition College of recent You are able to, Zoysia), where he majored in philosophy and minored ever. Hofstadter later authored that philosophy interested him “a bit more” than history, but he added: “I am astute enough to determine I’d no gifts within the field and jobs for philosophers were harder to find.” Especially affected by one teacher, Julius Pratt, he grew to become more and more drawn to history, and that he authored an undergraduate thesis criticizing Charles A. Beard’s economic interpretation of what causes the Civil War.
Like a lot of others throughout the Depression, Hofstadter thought that capitalism would be a pernicious system and wished for that triumph of socialism. While an undergraduate, he was elected president from the radical left-wing organization the nation’s Student League, and that he took part in a nationwide boycott of classes in 1935. After marrying a far more radical left-wing activist, Felice Swandos, in 1936, he gone to live in New You are able to City to review law. Locating the subject dull, however, he made the decision to pursue a graduate degree ever at Columbia College, not sure whether he wanted to become journalist or perhaps a historian.
Both he and the wife became a member of the Columbia unit from the Communist Party in 1938. Never confident with the party’s rigid doctrinaire positions and offended by Frederick Stalin’s Moscow show trials, he left the party after four several weeks, before the signing from the Soviet-Nazi Pact. For the following many years, he ongoing to see themself like a person from the radical left, although he was starting to think that the brand new Deal reforms might improve the cruelty and injustices from the capitalist system.
Hofstadter’s M.A. thesis evaluated the farming programs from the New Deal from the leftist perspective. Encouraged by Merle Curti to operate within the social good reputation for ideas, he opted for historic study of social Darwinism for any Ph.D. dissertation. While focusing on this project, he acquired a component-time position at Brooklyn College in 1940, adopted with a full-time position in the City College the following year, thanks to a Red Scare purge from the faculty. Following a attack on Gem Harbor, he steered clear of the draft due to a mixture of allergic reactions and bloating. Graduating together with his Ph.D. in 1942, he acquired a situation in the College of Maryland. Whenever a revision of his dissertation was printed in book form 2 yrs later as Social Darwinism in American Thought, 1860-1915. his academic career made an appearance secure.
Brown emphasizes that Hofstadter’s book on social Darwinism would be a product of “the political and intellectual milieu that formed its author’s youthful interaction having a tumultuous era.” As they recognized the validity of Darwinian theory like a scientific reason behind biological change, Hofstadter figured the use of the paradigm to human society was prone to a number of alternative interpretations. Given his ideological commitments, it’s not surprising he presented Herbert Spencer and William Graham Sumner as mainly apologists for laissez-faire.
(The whole section is 2146 words.)
Get Free Access
Start your free trial offer with eNotes for complete use of this resource and thousands more.