This case isn’t uncommon within my situation, I must submit abstract for conference in September through the finish of The month of january already. The main problem is I’ve no results yet. I am confident that in individuals 8 several weeks I’ll get pretty interesting results. But..
Crafting smooth abstract without reporting results?
I began something along wrinkles:
- This which is a key point.
- However, couple of studies about this subject happen to be done.
- Within our study, we match it up which
The problem is available in point 4, where I ought to report some results.
- How must i bypass that?
- What formulations must i use?
- Shall I speak in present, future, or past tense? The research is usualy designed in past tense like “we analysed, we compared. “, however in this situation I’d have a tendency to present tense.
Appreciate your help. Examples are welcome!
P.S. it is really an interesting discussion however did not produce actual guidelines of crafting it.
Don’t write results you do not have. Neither in our, past or future tense. Just do not do it. Yet, To be sure along with you there are conditions in which you need to write an abstract on on-going work. For instance, many big conferences within my field now request abstracts to become posted as much as 10 several weeks prior to the conference itself! If you’re a publish-doc remaining on the 12-month project, you need to present something but you will possibly not yet understand how things will come out. So, two techniques I suggest:
Just talk about the methodology, and offer your objectives inside a general way, without “predicting” particular results but insisting on the significance of the subject. That’s, highlight strongly your points #1 and #2, after which describe point #3 while you would your “results”. Such things as:
During this study, we compare the efficiency of the way A and B on given subsets of the reference database. We use a lot of different criteria for calculating efficiency, including …, … and … We discuss at length the implementation of subprocess X in method B, because its is not particularly enhanced within the existing literature.
Yes, it sounds vague, but that is the very best you are able to achieve honestly, without pretending to be aware what you anticipate finding.
Bait and switch: for those who have existing produces a carefully related study, you are able to incorporate them in your results. Mix this method with above, allowing you to have a minimum of a couple of specific leads to list inside your point #4. Then, when you’ll make your presentation, just present your brand-new results plus the old (many people would remove completely that old results, but which makes it an excessive amount of a “bait and switch” in my taste). It’s, in the end, very common for individuals to incorporate newer leads to orals/posters they acquired following the original submission. It’s not frowned upon, as lengthy while you have a decent agreement between your original abstract and also the final content.
clarified Jan 24 ’13 at 10:47
The task with ever-earlier deadlines for conferences (sometimes six several weeks or even more prior to the particular date!) makes arranging a conference a really difficult prospect.
You are playing only a number of options, not one of them particularly appealing:
Submit an abstract on incomplete research, and hope the jobs are completed prior to the conference.
Within this situation, you say something similar to “we’ll present our focus on X, Y, and Z.” You are making no claims concerning the findings associated with your projects in individuals areas, though. Additionally you attempt to edit the abstract, as appropriate and when possible, to higher reflect the topic material that you’ll really present in the conference.
Submit an abstract on already completed work. The benefit is that you simply know you’ve got the results and you may come up with a great presentation. The down-side of the is it means you’ll be presenting last year’s results only at that year’s conference. If you’re in a “hot” field, substandard ceding significant ground for your competitors when they get a little bit luckier than you, and they’ve findings right before a deadline and also you don’t.
Ultimately, there is no right response to which choice to take. You need to decide this according to what’s expected individuals inside your field, and just what impact this can dress in both you and your career (if you’re able to choose the safer track, or if you need to choose the greater-risk option). The only real factor that you ought to never do, when i stated above, so that as other posters have pointed out, is claim you have not acquired.
clarified Jan 24 ’13 at 23:48
Writing something did not do because the duration of submission is really a lie even if you’re sure you will get it eventually (In my opinion uncertainty exists everywhere).
It is just not your turn this season . target a different one or wait for a the coming year.
I’d speak from Information Technology (CS) perspective.
Submitting an abstract in CS conferences is among two:
- Submitting towards the abstracts (short papers) tabs on the conference.
- Submitting an abstract (i.e. 250 words) first then submitting the entire paper. For instance, nowadays AI has got the big guy submission deadline.
I suppose you mean the very first situation otherwise you’ll have virtually no time for preparing your results.
Then your missing results is among two:
- Area of the contribution (method)
- Evaluation (support) from the contribution (method)
Within the first situation, I truly recommend to not submit whatsoever unless of course your answers are ready. You simply don’t have new things within this situation .
The 2nd situation I’ll be more tolerated about this. In CS, you are able to experiment it by:
- In situation your missing answers are the experiments of the method, that you can do initial experiments and believe it is the general situation. Thus write your abstract according to it.
- Illustrate with examples and/or real life scenarios.
Do not do it. No results means no abstract.
Although this received many upticks, I are also told
That sounds incorrect. Any references or related experience?
which statement also offers some upticks. Although this is not a solution to “crafting an abstract” it tries to clarify my comment (but is simply too lengthy to become another comment). Hopefully it’s useful.
I believe there are plenty of things wrong with writing an abstract without results that it’s hard to explain my thinking. The no reason for attempting to write an abstract with no results is
No abstract means missed chance I am unable to afford that. I must present results I am i may have when from the conference.
That has recieved basically exactly the same quantity of upticks as my comment to avoid it. I disagree with “I am unable to afford that”. I have not heard or seen of somebody being denied tenure or perhaps a job simply because they did not present in a conference twelve months. Hiring decisions will never be so close that the single conference presentation (regardless of how esteemed) sways the choice. I’d argue there are very couple of upsides to submitting an abstract without results and potentially some downsides.
Submitting an abstract with no results won’t enable you to get a location in a highly esteemed conference or perhaps a keynote address. It can get you a location in a conference that basically accepts all abstracts, although not even more than that. In fields that i’m acquainted with conferences happen a minimum of every 6 several weeks and much more frequently every 3 several weeks. Which means that by not submitting you now are just delaying your presentation by 3-6 several weeks. Therefore the price of not submitting is really a 180 day delay along with a slightly different conference that’s potentially a little more esteemed (e.g. with results you could possibly obtain a talk rather of the poster).
In slow moving fields 6 several weeks is basically meaningless. In fast paced fields, 6 several weeks is really a lengthy time, however in the short moving fields I know individuals don’t present results until they’re going to be printed. What this means is you won’t want to submit an abstract of results you do not yet have. Well, I see hardly any price of waiting for the following conference.
What are the advantages of waiting. Again they aren’t great. The abstract will really represent what you will discuss. You will probably get make the correct session. There’s a greater possibility of obtaining a talk. If everything goes tits up, you won’t need to withdraw. Some individuals will not remember, a number of your close colleagues will which could hurt future references. Withdrawing also screws within the conference organizers and they’ll remember.
There’s even the issue of methods lengthy must you get results. When the abstract was due your day from the conference, presumably you would like to have results before submitting the abstract. Why not a week? Per month? 6 several weeks? Where’s the road?
Finally there’s the problem of integrity. While it’s possible to write the abstract to create no promises and just condition the present truth, this is actually difficult. Should you choose this frequently enough you will probably eventually create a statement that’s a lie.
So that they can answer the issue, how about:
We do not have any improvements yet because it is still N several weeks prior to the conference. When the conference comes around we’re sure we’ll have something interesting. Otherwise, we’ll present some old data or simply not appear.
Here’s a good example of an abstract without any results which was recognized for any conference source :
Look at genetic susceptibility for non-Hodgkin lymphoma within the InterLymph consortium
The incidence of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (National hockey league) has continuously elevated worldwide for several years and it is still present after considering altering diagnostic patterns and Aids infection rates. Although other important risks haven’t yet been identified, there’s substantial evidence suggesting rapport with problems that affect the defense mechanisms. A consortium which includes basically all situation-control studies presently being transported in Europe, The United States and Australia has lately been created (InterLymph) to assist stimulate and coordinate etiologic studies of lymphoma. Research is while using new WHO classification of lymphoproliferative disorders and also have comparable questionnaire data for many key lifestyle and ecological exposures. InterLymph may have substantial capacity to read the primary results of less frequent SNPs, gene-atmosphere interactions and rare sub-entities. Most studies with complete enrollment plan to handle genotyping of the initial number of SNPs in genes that lead to controlling the defense mechanisms, including IL1A, IL1RN, IL1B, IL2, IL6, IL10, TNF, LTA, and NOD2. The SNP list is going to be expanded according to interest and sources over in the future. Some DNA samples from 102 ethnically diverse individuals which have been sequenced and examined on a number of platforms included in the SNP500Cancer project (snp500cancer.nci.nih.gov ) assists as gold standards. Further, a round-robin of sample exchange will ensure genotyping consistency across participating laboratories. Initial is a result of case study of SNPs within the above genes will be provided and analytic issues is going to be discussed, including a strategy that can help assess the probability that statistically significant associations are false positive findings.
clarified Sep 8 ’14 at 3:00
The Way To Go
2016 Stack Exchange, Corporation