Previous article in issue: Football reminiscence for males with dementia: training from the realistic evaluation
Next article in issue: Back- and forefront-grounding ontology: going through the linkages between critical realism, pragmatism, and methodologies in health rehabilitation sciences
View issue TOC
Volume 19, Issue 1
March 2012
Pages 7182
Authors
Justin Cruickshank
- College of Birmingham POLSIS, Edgbaston, Birmingham, West Midlands, United kingdom
Look for more papers with this author
Justin Cruickshank, College of Birmingham POLSIS, Edgbaston, Birmingham, West Midlands B15 2TT, United kingdom.
E-mail: j.cruickshank@bham.ac.united kingdom
Abstract
CRUICKSHANK J. Nursing Inquiry 2012 19. 7182
Positioning positivism, critical realism and social constructionism within the health sciences: a philosophical orientation
This short article starts by thinking about the variations inside the positivist tradition after which it progresses to check two most prominent schools of postpositivism, namely critical realism and social constructionism. Critical realists hold, with positivism, that understanding ought to be positively applied, but reject the positivist method for doing it, quarrelling that causal explanations need to be based this is not on empirical regularities but on references to unobservable structures. Social constructionists have a different method of postpositivism and endorse a relativist rejection of truth and hold the task of scientific studies are to promote a scepticism that undermines any positive truth claim made. It’s contended that social constructionism is really a contradictory position.
Ancillary
Article Information
Full text: HTML PDF
2011 Blackwell Publishing Limited
- critical realism
- postpositivism
- social constructionism
- Issue online: 3 The month of january 2012
- Form of record online: 15 This summer 2011
- Recognized for publication 25 March 2011
Related content
Please enable Javascript to see the attached content want to know ,.
Citing Literature