Home » Thesis » The secularization thesis criticisms and rebuttals in writing

The secularization thesis criticisms and rebuttals in writing

The secularization thesis criticisms and rebuttals in writing man rather

Secularization as defined within the Oxford dictionary of Sociology (Marshall G, 1998) is the procedure whereby, particularly in modern industrial societies, faith, practices, and institutions lose social significance. The secularization thesis argues this has happened in modern societies, as a result of quantity of factors. This essay will assess whether this theory has value. I’ll present the primary definitions of faith and also the contrasting perspectives, because the concept of religion and each side from the secularization thesis need to be understood to be able to review it.

So that you can know the secularization thesis, religion must, to begin with, be defined. There’s two primary approaches which have been presented by sociologists, the functional and substantive definitions (Haralambos and Holborn, 2000). The running definition pertains to the needs of faith – what it really does. It claims that one of these simple purposes could be to ‘provide methods to ultimate problems’ (Bruce, 1996). Religion can provide guidelines for the way some thing based on the functional definition, which plays a role in social order and stability. The substantive definition sees religion as what it’s instead of what it really does. So religion might be described within the following way based on the substantive definition: beliefs and actions, which entail Gods along with other supernatural beings (Jorgensen et al. 1997)

It’s felt there are issues with these meanings. First of all, the running definition might be viewed as defining religion being an umbrella term. For this includes belief systems

which some may not view like a religion, for instance nationalism might be seen as an religion underneath the functional definition because it offers solutions to fundamental questions

The secularization thesis criticisms and rebuttals in writing life was

(among the purpose of religion). Next, it might be hard to say how much of an ‘ultimate problem’ is within different societies, what’s a supreme condition in one place in the world might not be in another. It’s also felt you will find issues with the substantive definition. The supernatural is pointed out within this meaning therefore it excludes religions that don’t have confidence in the supernatural, Buddhism being a good example of this. The substantive definition may be viewed as getting a Western slant most Western religions possess a God along with a belief within the supernatural. This method may cause difficulties with regards to identifying individuals belief systems, in other areas around the globe, that don’t have a god or perhaps a belief within the supernatural as religions.

Advocates of the secularization thesis reason that a general change in society has happened because of modernity which telecomutting saves gas has brought to a general change in religion leading to secularization. Pre-modernity, religion namely Christianity would be a dominant pressure also it pervaded every part of society. All understanding around the globe originated from religion as well as an individual’s existence was marked by religious occasions. The Reformation marked a general change in the dominant religious tradition in Europe and led the way for modernity (Bruce, 1996). Science and industrialisation, that have been factors in modernity, were also stated to increase the decline of faith as people looked to those understandings around the globe as opposed to the religious understanding.

The secularization thesis criticisms and rebuttals in writing difficulties when it comes

Darwin’s transformative theory is proof of this because it explains the evolution of individual as opposed to the development of man.

The job of sociological theorists has provided emphasis to the thought of secularization. The part of faith as seen by Durkheim ended up being to promote social unity and also to

reinforce social values he claimed that religion was basically the worship of society. Although he predicted religion would dwindle significant within an industrialised

society as other institutions like the education system provides social unity, he didn’t think that religion would disappear because of modernity stating that there is ‘something eternal in religion’ (Durkheim, 1961 reported in Haralambos and Holborn, 2000). Rationalization would be a cause within the subsidence of faith as Weber believed. He foresaw’disenchantment’ using the supernatural as rational scientific thought emerged. Weber thought that as societies achieved scientific and technological understandings, people would cease to depend on religious meanings and explanations and rather use rational explanations to know their world. He believed this was a inevitable results of modernisation. Religion as Marx believed was a fantasy that stored the significant class within their place and maintained the strength of the ruling class (Haralambos and Holborn, 2000). He believed that religion was the ‘opium from the people’ (O’Donnell, 1988), which alleviated the discomfort brought on by oppression and exploitation. For Marx, capitalism would aid the decline of faith. This could occur, as classless communism would replace capitalism which indicates religion would not be needed, because the social system it helped to help keep in position would no more exist. be.

What exactly evidence can there be to point out that secularization has happened and just how could it be measured? A lot of evidence that’s given is centered on the Christian religion in great britan. Statistics are utilized to support the secularization theory. A vital theorist about this

issue, John Wilson uses statistics as indicators of secularization. These statistics consider church attendance, church membership and participation in religious events. The data reveal that there’s been a stable loss of formal religious practice (O’Donnell, 1997). Church membership of Trinitarian places of worship has fallen from 8.8% in 1970 to six.4% in 1995. Civil marriages instead of church marriages have risen from 40% in 1971 in the uk to 48% in 1988 in the uk. Other figures also indicate the decline of formal religious practice. The share of baptized Roman Catholics who really attend mass has declined from 47% in 1900 to 33% in 1990. The decreasing quantity of local clergy can also be utilized as indicators of secularization. From 1900 to 1984 there’s been an autumn by 10,000 in the amount of Church of England clerics and also, since 1975 there has been under 100 ordinations annually of Catholic clergymen (Bruce, 1996).

What exactly other evidence is offered as an indication of secularization? The way in which individuals are living their lives happens to be an indicative manifestation of religion losing its social significance (Browne, 1998). The disapproval from the church regarding divorce, abortions, homosexuality, contraception along with other social issues appears to not have had an effect on people’s conduct. Having a recent report proclaiming that 4 from 10 marriages are anticipated to finish in divorce (Morrison, 2002). This may be stated to exhibit a declining need for religious morals and beliefs in people’s lives. Yet there’s also evidence that secularization is going on in religion itself, as simpler divorce laws and regulations, allowing divorced individuals to remarry in places of worship, the abolition of Latin in Catholic services and also the ordination of ladies clergymen can indicate the church becoming secularised and abandoning its traditional beliefs.

Other evidence used may be the decline of spiritual institutions cheap the ability and influence from the church in society has declined. The union that when existed between your condition and also the church isn’t any many the church has become able where it may disapprove from the governmental policies, so it did using the Conservative government from 1979-1997. The government didn’t understand the views from the church. Other institutions emerged to consider within the roles the church once performed, as an example the welfare condition now takes care of the disadvantaged groups in society. This method of faith withdrawing from and getting no influence in public places and political existence is called differentiation .

There has been criticisms made from the secularization thesis for several reasons. There’s evidence to exhibit that although those who are not regular attendees at church buildings or people of spiritual organisations still preserve faith (Haralambos and Holborn, 2000). The British Social Attitudes survey discovered that 72% of individuals claimed to think in some kind of supernatural power while only 10% claimed they didn’t have confidence in God (Bruce, 1996). This implies that faith aren’t losing their social significance which people may go through they don’t need religious institutions to possess a belief along with a exposure to God..

Another point elevated may be the assumption that religion was as vital previously as claimed. Regular church moving in Victorian Britain might have been affected by non-religious factors as David Martin views it (Haralambos and Holborn, 2000). He argues that likely to church was purely to attain respectability and never simply because they

had faith. Therefore, the reason behind a loss of church attendance might be that there’s less social pressure to go to as opposed to a loss of faith. If religion wasn’t as essential as it’s been assumed then it may be the situation there is not a decline of faith whatsoever and now we are viewing yesteryear as some kind of ‘golden era’ regarding religion.

The development of non-Christian religion in great britan may also be used from the secularization thesis. Britain is really a modern industrial society yet the amount of Muslims for instance keeps growing. From 1980 to 1995, the amount of Muslims has elevated by 274,000, Sikhs by 200,000, Hindus by 35,000 and Buddhists by 28,000 (Haralambos and Holborn, 2000). These figures reveal that religion is extremely significant to those groups in great britan disproving the secularization theory. Additionally, it implies that Christianity seems is the only religion in great britan that’s in decline.

Critics cite the united states like a situation that proves the secularization thesis wrong. It felt that’s a highly industrialised urban society yet religion appears to become influential and is an essential part of people’s lives. The data show a really different picture to Britain. Participation reaches a greater rate compared to Britain with 42% of american citizens claiming to possess attended a church or synagogue in the last week with 45% of Protestants and 51% of Catholics creating this statistic when compared with 10% in great britan (Haralambos and Holborn, 2000). A complete insufficient religious belief is a lot lower in the united states with the amount of Americans claiming to possess no religion being between 7 to eightPercent in the united states when compared with 30% of individuals in great britan (Bruce, 1996).

To conclude, the secularization thesis comes with validity even though the theory are only able to be used in some cases. For instance, there’s been a loss of the influence

of institutional religion on society in general yet examples for example America show the idea cannot be relevant to all modern nations. The thesis can’t be confirmed yet it can’t be discredited as secularization to some degree has had place even though it has

not gone so far as some supporters from the secularization thesis have claimed. Secularization could be stated to possess happened for the reason that there’s been a loss of Christian places of worship regarding membership and attendance which the influence from the church has abated the development of non-Christian religions and also the ongoing faith that individuals hold is evidence that modernity doesn’t always mean an occurrence of secularization.

Not what you are searching for?

If the essay is not quite what you are searching for, why don’t you order your personal custom Coursework essay, dissertation or bit of coursework that solutions your exact question? You will find United kingdom authors much like me on hands, waiting that will help you. Everyone is capable of an advanced locally of expert knowledge, so we can write a fully researched, fully referenced complete original response to your essay question. Just complete our simple order form and you can have your customised Coursework operate in your email box, within 3 hrs.


If you are using thing about this page in your work, you have to give a citation, the following:

Essay United kingdom, Assess The Secularization Thesis. Offered by: world wide web.essay.united kingdom.com/coursework/evaluate-the-secularization-thesis.php [05-10-16].

More details:

If you’re the initial author of the content with no longer want it printed on the website then please click the link below to request removal:


Essay United kingdom offers professional custom essay writing, dissertation writing and coursework writing service. Our work is top quality, plagiarism-free and delivered promptly.

Essay United kingdom is really a buying and selling name of Student Academic Services Limited. a business registered in Britain under Company Number 08866484 .

Top pages:


Berger, P.L. 1969. The sacred canopy: Aspects of a sociological theory of faith. Garden City: Doubleday.

Berger, P.L. 1999. The desecularization around the globe: A worldwide overview. Within The desecularization around the globe: Resurgent religions and world politics. erectile dysfunction. G. Weigel, D. Martin, J. Sacks, G. Davie, T. Weiming, along with a.A. An-Na’im, 1–18. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

Blumenberg, H. 1983. The authenticity from the modern day. Cambridge, MA: Durch Press.

Brierley, P.W. 1998. Religion in the uk 1900–2000. London: Christian Research.

Bruce, S. 2002. God is dead: Secularization in the western world. London: Wiley-Blackwell.

Bruce, S. 2006. Secularization and the significance of individualized religion. Hedgehog Review 8(35): 35–45.

Bruce, S. 2011. Secularization: In defence of the unfashionable theory. United kingdom: Oxford College Press.

Calhoun, C. M. Juergensmeyer, and J. van Antwerpen. 2011. Rethinking secularism. Oxford: Oxford College Press.

Camus, A. 2008 [1952]. The digital rebel: An essay on man in revolt. London: Paw Prints.

Casanova, J. 1994. Public religions nowadays. Chicago: College of Chicago.

Casanova, J. 2006. Rethinking secularization: A worldwide comparative perspective. Hedgehog Review 8: 7–22.

Crockett, A. and D. Voas. 2006. Generations of decline: Religious alternation in twentieth century Britain. Journal from the Study of faith 45: 567–584. CrossRef

Dobbelaere, K. 1981. Theories of secularization. Current Sociology 29: 15–30.

Dobbelaere, K. 1999. Towards a built-in perspective around the processes associated with the descriptive idea of secularization. Sociology of faith 60: 229–247. CrossRef

Dobbelaere, K. 2002. Secularization: An analysis at three levels. Brussells: Presses Interuniversitaires Europennes.

Fincke, R. and R. Stark. 1998. Religious choice and competition. American Sociological Review 63: 761–766.

Freud, S. 1913. Totem and taboo. In Standard edition from the mental works of sigmund freud. erectile dysfunction. and trans. J. Strachey. Vol. XIII, 1–161. London: Hogarth Press, 1953–1974.

Freud, S. 1927. The way forward for a fantasy. In Standard edition. Vol. XXI, 1–56.

Freud, S. 1930. Civilization and it is discontents. In Standard edition. Vol. XXI, 58–149.

Gabor, G. and H. de Vriese. 2009. Rethinking secularization. United kingdom: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Gaukroger, S. 2008. The emergence of the scientific culture: science and also the shaping of modernity, 1210–1685. London: Clarendon, Oxford.

Geroulanos, S. 2010. An atheism that isn’t humanist emerges in French thought. Stanford: Stanford College Press.

Gorski, P.S. along with a. Altinordu. 2008. After secularization? Annual Overview of Sociology 34: 55–85. CrossRef

Habermas, J. 1983. Political-philosophical profiles. London: Heinemann.

Habermas, J. 2006. Religion within the public sphere. European Journal of Philosophy 14: 1–25. CrossRef

Heidegger, M. 1969. The ontotheological metabolic rate of metaphysics. In Identity and difference. Trans. J. Stambough. New You are able to: Harper Row.

Iannaconne, L.R. R. Finke, and R. Stark. 1997. Deregulating religion: The economies of church and condition. Economical Inquiry 35: 350–364. CrossRef

Kojve, A. 1968. Introduction a la Lecture de Hegel: leons sur La phnomnologie de l’esprit, professes de 1933 1939 l’cole plusieurs hautes-tudes. erectile dysfunction. R. Queneau. Paris: Gallimard, TEL Edition.

Lwith, K. 1949. Meaning ever. Chicago: College of Chicago Press.

Martin, D. 2005. On secularization: Perfectly into a revised generalised theory. London: Ashgate.

Marx, K. 1975 [1844]. Around the jewish question. In Marx and engels collected works. vol. 3. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

Milbank, J. 1993. Theology and social theory: Beyond secular reason. London: Blackwell.

Pecora, V.P. 2006. Secularization and cultural critique: Religion, nation, modernity. Chicago: College of Chicago Press.

Schmitt, C. 1985 [1923]. Political theology: Four chapters on the idea of sovereignty. Trans. G. Schwab. Chicago: College of Chicago.

Stark, R. and W.S. Bainbridge. 1985. The way forward for religion: Secularization, revival, and cult formation. Berkeley: College of California Press.

Stark, R. and R. Finke. 2000. Functions of belief: Explaining a persons side of faith. Berkeley: College of California Press.

Stark, R. and that i.Ur. Iannaconne. 1994. A supply-side reinterpretation from the so-known as secularization of Europe. Journal from the Study of faith 33: 230–252. CrossRef

Steinfels, P. 2008. Modernity and belief: Charles Taylor’s a secular age. Commonweal 135: 14–21. May 9.

Stiegler, B. 2010. Ce qui fait que la vie vaut la peine d’tre vcue: En pharmacologie. Paris: Flammarion.

Swatos Junior. W.H. and D.V.A. Olsen. 2000. The secularization debate. London: Rowman Littlefield.

Taubes, J. 2009. Occidental eschatology. Trans. D. Ratmoko. Stanford: Stanford College Press.

Taylor, C. 2007. The secular age. Harvard: Harvard College Press.

Toscano, A. 2010. Fanaticism: Around the purposes of a concept. London: Verso.

Warner, R. 2010. Secularization and it is discontents. London: Wiley-Blackwell.

Wegner, P.E. 2009. Existence between two deaths, 1989–2001: U.S. culture within the lengthy nineties. Durham/London: Duke College Press.

Wilson, B.R. 1966. Religion in secular society: A sociological comment. London: Watts.

Wilson, B.R. 1982. Religion in sociological perspective. New You are able to: Oxford College Press.

Wilson, B.R. 1998. The secularization thesis: Critique and rebuttals. In Secularization and social integration. erectile dysfunction. R. Laermans et al. Leuven: Leuven College Press.

Share this:
custom writing low cost
Order custom writing