Not have I just read a brief story that can compare with Happy Endings by Margaret Atwood. Ought to be fact, enough my peers and that i have grown to be baffled on if you should even think of it as the best story. It’s split into four parts, each giving a really frank and emotionless group of love scenarios. She purely informs it like it’s just fact-based and stoic without any kind of feeling whatsoever. One factor results in another, and that’s that. Overall, the word what that Atwood uses in Happy Endings is extremely blunt and forward, which is proven through the syntax and word choice through the passage.

Certainly one of example of how Margaret Atwood’s utilization of short sentences is viewed in the initial paragraph, in section A. “They purchase a charming house. Property values increase. Eventually, whenever they can afford live-in help, they’ve two children, with whom they’re devoted” (Atwood 90). As you can plainly see, these sentences appear a little strange to stay in a tale, for they’re simply listing off occasions that happened in John and Mary’s existence while neglecting to further elaborate in it. However, the very first portion of this story is possibly probably the most straightforward only as this scenario informs the storyplot from a perfect perspective. No problems arise throughout this, yet within the other sections Atwood offers a variety of scenarios. Even though, the syntax doesn’t change that much. “One evening John complains concerning the food. He’s never were not impressed with the meals before. Mary is hurt” (Atwood 90). Again, she proceeds with simply listing off how one factor would result in another without entering details or supplying a further explanation by using more varied sentences.

One other way that Atwood is removed as very plain and honest is thru the language that they uses. In section A, she really uses exactly the same group of adjectives two times within merely a couple of sentences of one another. “John and Mary possess a stimulating and challenging sex existence and useful friends… Both of them have hobbies that they find stimulating and challenging” (Atwood 90). The truth that she uses “stimulating and challenging” two times within this same paragraph shows that she gets indifference with this whole scenario, most likely because she knows that it’s unreal. In fact no-one can really lead this type of existence that Atwood described in section A, and she or he is aware of this. She also seems to use words that embody the way the figures feel. “…and after he’s eaten dinner he fucks her and then he falls asleep…” (Atwood 90). The factor that jumps out relating to this sentence is using the term fuck. Rather of claiming “they made love,” she uses the term fuck to suggest the sex wasn’t as passionate because the pair of them weren’t really deeply in love with one another. If she’d used “made love” rather, this could have indicated towards the readers that John and Mary had more powerful feeling for one another, and sure might have become married instead of getting the sad ending for Mary in the finish of section B, by which she commits suicide by overdosing on sleep aids, aspirin, and alcohol.

Lastly, the central concept that Atwood looks to place across is presented in basically British in the very finish from the passage in section F.

“The only authentic ending may be the one provided here: John and Mary die. John and Mary die. John and Mary die” (Atwood 92). In my experience, this will make it appear as though Atwood is extremely narrow-minded along with a pessimist. Possibly she might have had some bad past encounters together with her relationships, which is why why she is removed as so blunt and simple throughout the path of this passage. In her own eyes, regardless of how someone lives their existence or how fulfilling it might be, the essential the fact is that people all finish up dying within the finish.

Atwood, Margaret. “Happy Endings.” The Longman Anthology of Short Fiction. New You are able to: Longman, 2001. 90-92.