Home » Thesis » Islamic cultural centre thesis writing

Islamic cultural centre thesis writing

Islamic cultural centre thesis writing center, citing on the one

The Park51 Islamic Cultural Center Debate

    Here are links to competing views about the Park51 Islamic Cultural Center. I also offer my opinion on the subject.

The Park51 website. which includes this vision statement :
Park51 will be dedicated to pluralism, service, arts and culture, education and empowerment, appreciation for our city and a deep respect for our planet. Park51 will join New York to the world, offering a welcoming community center with multiple points of entry.

With world-class facilities, a global scope and strong local roots, Park 51 will offer a friendly and accessible platform for conversations across our identities.

August 21, 2010 article by Tom Rogan of the Guardian contending that there is considerable dispute within each major American political party over the building of the community center, citing on the one hand statements from Republicans Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich opposing the community center and responses from other Republicans such as Ted Olson, Pat Buchanan, Chris Christie, and Grover Norquist against what they perceive as overreaction to the project. He also cites conflicting views among Democrats.

August 17, 2010, post by Valerie Elverton Dixon in the Washington Post, entitled "The Park 51 Islamic Cultural Center and American Values ."

August 14, 2010Â article by Pauline Jelinek of AP describing President Obama's statements on the subject and reaction from other major political figures.

July 28, 2010 Statement of the Anti-Defamation League taking the position that people have a constitutional right to build the center, but that they should choose another location. The ADL states:

Islamic cultural centre thesis writing Park51 will join

the proponents of the Islamic Center may have every right to build at this site, and may even have chosen the site to send a positive message about Islam. The bigotry some have expressed in attacking them is unfair, and wrong. But ultimately this is not a question of rights, but a question of what is right. In our judgment, building an Islamic Center in the shadow of the World Trade Center will cause some victims more pain � unnecessarily � and that is not right.

    The ADL also has a page with links to stories in the media about the project.

    Although I acknowledge the truth of the ADL's statement that the proposed location of this building near Ground Zero will cause some victims more pain, ultimately I believe that permitting the construction of the Islamic Cultural Center in this place demonstrates faith in fundamental American values of tolerance and freedom of religion. In some Islamic countries Christians and Jews face brutal discrimination - no churches or synagogues are permitted in Saudi Arabia, and evangelism is punishable by death. The construction of an Islamic cultural center in a place that is sacred to all Americans will serve as a beacon for freedom and the American way of life, and a repudiation of the prejudice and hatred that the terrorists stand for. Our Constitution protects the Free Exercise of Religion.

Islamic cultural centre thesis writing education and

    Governor David Patterson generously offered state land in an alternative location for the project. Although this proposal was made with the best of intentions, in my opinion its implementation would have been unconstitutional because it violates the other constitutional provision protecting freedom of religion the Establishment Clause. Just as many Islamic countries do a poor job of protecting the Free Exercise of religion, many also do not observe the Separation of Church and State. The government should not be offering land to any religious body.

    It is no coincidence that some of the loudest voices expressing outrage over the building of what is popularly called the "Ground Zero Mosque" belong to the people who are most vociferous in promoting Christian symbols and doctrine in the public sphere the teaching of creationism and prayer in the public schools, government aid for parochial schools, and the prominent display of the Ten Commandments in courthouses and on statehouse land. These people fail to recognize that what's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. If it is constitutional to have Christian symbols and ideology in schools, courthouses, and public squares, then Islamic symbols and ideology also belong there.Â

    Freedom of religion means that the government must remain neutral as to religion neither favoring nor opposing it. Under the Constitution religion is a private matter. It is up to individuals and private groups what their religious beliefs shall be, and where to erect their religious institutions. Americans don't dictate to people where they can build their churches, synagogues, and mosques.

The Park51 Islamic Cultural Center Debate

    Here are links to competing views about the Park51 Islamic Cultural Center. I also offer my opinion on the subject.

The Park51 website. which includes this vision statement :
Park51 will be dedicated to pluralism, service, arts and culture, education and empowerment, appreciation for our city and a deep respect for our planet. Park51 will join New York to the world, offering a welcoming community center with multiple points of entry.

With world-class facilities, a global scope and strong local roots, Park 51 will offer a friendly and accessible platform for conversations across our identities.

August 21, 2010 article by Tom Rogan of the Guardian contending that there is considerable dispute within each major American political party over the building of the community center, citing on the one hand statements from Republicans Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich opposing the community center and responses from other Republicans such as Ted Olson, Pat Buchanan, Chris Christie, and Grover Norquist against what they perceive as overreaction to the project. He also cites conflicting views among Democrats.

August 17, 2010, post by Valerie Elverton Dixon in the Washington Post, entitled "The Park 51 Islamic Cultural Center and American Values ."

August 14, 2010Â article by Pauline Jelinek of AP describing President Obama's statements on the subject and reaction from other major political figures.

July 28, 2010 Statement of the Anti-Defamation League taking the position that people have a constitutional right to build the center, but that they should choose another location. The ADL states:
the proponents of the Islamic Center may have every right to build at this site, and may even have chosen the site to send a positive message about Islam. The bigotry some have expressed in attacking them is unfair, and wrong. But ultimately this is not a question of rights, but a question of what is right. In our judgment, building an Islamic Center in the shadow of the World Trade Center will cause some victims more pain � unnecessarily � and that is not right.

    The ADL also has a page with links to stories in the media about the project.

    Although I acknowledge the truth of the ADL's statement that the proposed location of this building near Ground Zero will cause some victims more pain, ultimately I believe that permitting the construction of the Islamic Cultural Center in this place demonstrates faith in fundamental American values of tolerance and freedom of religion. In some Islamic countries Christians and Jews face brutal discrimination - no churches or synagogues are permitted in Saudi Arabia, and evangelism is punishable by death. The construction of an Islamic cultural center in a place that is sacred to all Americans will serve as a beacon for freedom and the American way of life, and a repudiation of the prejudice and hatred that the terrorists stand for. Our Constitution protects the Free Exercise of Religion.

    Governor David Patterson generously offered state land in an alternative location for the project. Although this proposal was made with the best of intentions, in my opinion its implementation would have been unconstitutional because it violates the other constitutional provision protecting freedom of religion the Establishment Clause. Just as many Islamic countries do a poor job of protecting the Free Exercise of religion, many also do not observe the Separation of Church and State. The government should not be offering land to any religious body.

    It is no coincidence that some of the loudest voices expressing outrage over the building of what is popularly called the "Ground Zero Mosque" belong to the people who are most vociferous in promoting Christian symbols and doctrine in the public sphere the teaching of creationism and prayer in the public schools, government aid for parochial schools, and the prominent display of the Ten Commandments in courthouses and on statehouse land. These people fail to recognize that what's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. If it is constitutional to have Christian symbols and ideology in schools, courthouses, and public squares, then Islamic symbols and ideology also belong there.Â

    Freedom of religion means that the government must remain neutral as to religion neither favoring nor opposing it. Under the Constitution religion is a private matter. It is up to individuals and private groups what their religious beliefs shall be, and where to erect their religious institutions. Americans don't dictate to people where they can build their churches, synagogues, and mosques.


Share this:
custom writing low cost
Order custom writing

ads