Home » Dissertations » Dissertation proposal defense questions for murder

Dissertation proposal defense questions for murder

Dissertation proposal defense questions for murder to be criticised

Here gleam selection of 12 dissertation topics and concepts on crimial and evidence law. We’ve provided these topics that will assist you make your own great law dissertation topics.

Example Dissertation Topics Ideas

1. May be the Defence of Reduced Responsibility fairly construed under British Law?

The defence of reduced responsibility is made the decision underneath the Homicide Act 1957 (HA 1957) s. 2(1) (as amended using the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 (CJOA 2009)) and might just be a defence in murder (Campbell [1997] Crim LR 495). The conclusion result’s the defendant must show s/he’s 1) a clinical condition 2) this problem impaired outstanding ability and three) provides and reason for the act that introduced to dying of 1 other. This model remains criticised to get excessively limited thus this subject will most likely be explored when the defence that is application must be extended, especially in relation to human legal legal legal rights concerns.

2. The overall principle in Criminal Law is the fact that many people have the effect of his crimes only. The key factor of qui peccat per allum alone isn’t a maxim of criminal law (Tesco v Natrass [1972] AC 153). However, prone to growing body of law demanding fairness, which requires corporations to acquire responsible for the functions from the organs?

This subject will explore the exceptions to when ideas is broken responsible for crimes of others. The primary areas this discussion will explore are: vicarious liability and 2) negligence accessories and conspirators under criminal law. Thus, it’ll determine these exceptions are fair and proportionate reaction to an undertaking of collusion rather of the individual committing the crime.

Dissertation proposal defense questions for murder in relation to

3. May be the law of rape sufficient to protect rightful victims, but prevent any susipicious activity in regards to the provisions by bogus “victims”?

Prone to essential good good good balance to be produced in rules of rape, because it is sometimes complicated to differentiate in the “real” and “bogus” claim. Introduced on by this is often that consent and sexual good status for your victim may be important components although these questions shouldn’t extend beyond the alleged offence using the victim (ss. 41-3 Youth Justice Criminal Evidence Act 1999, R v Kevin John Cartwright, unreported, (2007)). However, because the situation of R v A [2001] UKHL 25 identified the text relating to the victim and offender is relevant, since it can provide loans to consent. But rules is putting the victim on trial, which signifies an imbalance within the system.

4. May be the criminal law’s method of Omissions sufficient?

This subject will explore simply how much there needs to be criminal liability for omissions, meaning the glory between criminal negligence and recklessness will most likely be explored. Within the situation of R v Miller [1983] 1 All ER 978 it had been held when the conduct in the omission is equivalent to an positive act then there needs to be criminal liability. This really is frequently a questionable approach, since the traditional model can be a crook must just be criminally responsible for an positive act.

Dissertation proposal defense questions for murder topics that will

Thus, this subject will explore the British along with other common law jurisdictions to uncover the viability of applications.

5. Would be the modern strategies to the old saying intention in British Criminal Law fit for purpose?

The problem of intention is within the center of criminal liability, because understanding from the crime and intention may vary. Within the situation within the psychologically ill the understanding of undertaking the act might not equal intention. Also, the problem of automatism creates a difficult line to uncover when there’s and isn’t the appropriate intention. Bratty v AG for Northern Ireland [1963] AC 386 (HL) held that for almost any crime that needs mens rea it’s important for the requisite intention to obtain identified. Thus, this subject will explore the low sides in ascertaining intention.

6. Once the Law Commission’s Report 2006 across the reform of Homicide be enacted into British Law?

This subject will examine when the reform of homicide is essential, concerning is a warm reception within the Law Commission’s Report. However, presently there is no movement to presenting the reforms. Thus, this examination will identify when the three tier method of homicide must be implemented into British law.

7. May be the law on Corporate Wrongful dying fit for purpose?

The Company Wrongful dying and Homicide Act 2007 (CMHA 2007) could be a extended anticipated and necessary addition for British company law, but you will find questions over its usefulness. The primary issue with this act can it be remains centred across the attribution model identified in Lennard’s Transporting Co Limited v Asiatic Oil Co Limited [1915] AC 705. Thus, this examination will critique the effectiveness of attribution model while using management as opposed to making one with assorted pure gross negligence test while using the duty of research in management to create vicarious liability. Thus, the British model will most likely be instead of an italian man , and US models to determine if reform in the process is required.

8. May be the law on Confessions and ill-Become Evidence sufficiently balanced in British law or fruit inside the poison tree principle be applied?

This subject will to obtain a comparative approach relating to the US (Arizona v Evans, 116 s. CT. 1185 (1995)) and British (R v Sang [1980] AC 402) strategies to confessions and ill-become evidence. Thus, it’ll explore the approaches under s. 76 and s. 78 of PACE 1984 while using the model utilized in america. It’ll determine the fruit inside the poison tree must be implemented in British Evidence Law otherwise.

9. Simply how much should DNA and Forensic evidence be scrutinised using the legal protections, because such evidence are as indefensible by juries?

This subject will explore if treating DNA and Forensic evidence is correctly scrutinised under British law. Thus, it’ll explore the issue law and miscarriages of justice to find out if there needs to be greater scrutiny about how precisely this evidence is presented. This will be relevant to make sure fair representation for that jury, to avoid misrepresentations. And in addition it will draw upon the secrecy within the jury process and treating such evidence, that may derive from fatally problematic perceptions.

10. Should Bad Character Evidence result in look out of the trial process especially consequently evidence could be a breach of due process in other jurisdictions?

This subject will explore the allowance of bad character evidence in British law, that’s considerably completely different from the united states . states model. Thus, this examination will to obtain a comparative review of unhealthy character provisions of ss. 98 to 113 within the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (CJA 2003) to find out if these provisions can comparable to a breach of due process.

11. Simply how much would be the British Rules surrounding Competence and Compellability in Evidence law fit for purpose?

This subject will explore the provisions surrounding issues like the “to silence” along with the legal legal legal rights within the spouse in relation to giving evidence. This examination can be a comparative review of US and British law, that are clearly different whereby the main reason of the usa system draws on protecting Constitutional Legal legal legal rights. Thus, you are able to reason that you’ve a breach of due process in British law, and that is that question which is explored during this subject.

12. Is treating expert witness evidence in British Law fit for purpose nowadays?

This subject will to obtain a comparative review of US, Australian and British law across the role of expert witnesses, to be able to decide if the British model needs reform. Rules Commission’s 2011 Number of Expert Witnesses will most likely be examined because the reason for possible reforms, where the Australian Bonython (1984) 38 SASR 45 has performed an essential comparison, and contains been reported in British situation law (Luttrell [2004] EWCA Crim 1344). Thus, this examination determines the viability within the Law Commission’s suggested reforms.

How can we help?

  • Law Essay Writing Service
  • Law Dissertation Writing Service
  • View All Law Services

Contacting Us

Share this:
custom writing low cost
Order custom writing